Because the cross breeding of a horse and a donkey can't create a new species, doesn't that prove that evolution can't happen?
- The exact opposite. You are brilliant.
Has any cross breeding ever created a new species of animal? NO?
- Yes, many.
And if you can't create a new species then evolution is just a false argument, YES?
- Showing your brilliance again.
-
All the cross breeding of two different species not being able to reproduce proves is that the offspring has certain developmental issues brought upon by the breeding of two different species. This is largely, yet not entirely, caused by differing chromosome numbers.
Look, I could go on, but it would be a pointless argument. You disagree with evolution and aren't prepared to objectively consider the opposite side's arguments. This is evident by the fact that you've entirely ignored the dozens comments that disprove your statements, and made the best answer the one that agrees. So instead I'm going to ask a different question.
How would evolution, as a scientific theory, conflict with creation. Creation states that the earth, the moon, all species, and everything in the universe was created by god. Evolution states that species change over time due to natural selection. These statements don't conflict. Rather, I believe that you disagree with abiogenesis, the scientific theory of how life came about, and have mislabeled evolution as abiogenesis. I don't expect you to critically assess if this is the case, but I would still encourage you to do so.
-
But that's not what evolution says happened. It's not about cross-breeding at all.
It's about the survival of the fittest, the most adaptable, and the ones which can take advantage of food sources and can learn.