Because the cross breeding of a horse and a donkey can't create a new species, doesn't that prove that evolution can't happen?
Favorites|Homepage
Subscriptions | sitemap
HOME > > Because the cross breeding of a horse and a donkey can't create a new species, doesn't that prove that evolution can't happen?

Because the cross breeding of a horse and a donkey can't create a new species, doesn't that prove that evolution can't happen?

[From: ] [author: ] [Date: 16-03-07] [Hit: ]
English author Malcolm Muggeridge commented on the lack of evidence for evolution. He noted that wild speculations flourished nevertheless. Then he said: “The Genesis account seems, by comparison, sober enough and at least has the merit of being validly related to what we know about human beings and their behavior.” He said that the unfounded claims of millions of years for man’s evolution “and wild leaps from skull to skull,......

*** ce chap. 7 p. 98 par. 42 “Ape-Men”—What Were They? ***
42 When reviewing a book on evolution, English author Malcolm Muggeridge commented on the lack of evidence for evolution. He noted that wild speculations flourished nevertheless. Then he said: “The Genesis account seems, by comparison, sober enough and at least has the merit of being validly related to what we know about human beings and their behavior.” He said that the unfounded claims of millions of years for man’s evolution “and wild leaps from skull to skull, cannot but strike anyone not caught up in the [evolutionary] myth as pure fantasy.” Muggeridge concluded: “Posterity will surely be amazed, and I hope vastly amused, that such slipshod and unconvincing theorizing should have so easily captivated twentieth-century minds and been so widely and recklessly applied.”58

=======UPDATED===============

*** ce chap. 7 pp. 88-89 pars. 16-18 “Ape-Men”—What Were They? ***
16 In a book review of The Myths of Human Evolution written by evolutionists Niles Eldredge and Ian Tattersall, Discover magazine observed that the authors eliminated any evolutionary family tree. Why? After noting that “the links that make up the ancestry of the human species can only be guessed at,” this publication stated: “Eldredge and Tattersall insist that man searches for his ancestry in vain. . . . If the evidence were there, they contend, ‘one could confidently expect that as more hominid fossils were found the story of human evolution would become clearer. Whereas, if anything, the opposite has occurred.’”
17 Discover concluded: “The human species, and all species, will remain orphans of a sort, the identities of their parents lost to the past.”22 Perhaps “lost” from the standpoint of evolutionary theory. But has not the Genesis alternative “found” our parents as they actually are in the fossil record—fully human, just as we are?
18 The fossil record reveals a distinct, separate origin for apes and for humans. That is why fossil evidence of man’s link to apelike beasts is nonexistent. The links really have never been there"
keywords: the,39,happen,Because,evolution,breeding,and,create,new,species,prove,of,horse,can,cross,doesn,that,donkey,Because the cross breeding of a horse and a donkey can't create a new species, doesn't that prove that evolution can't happen?
New
Hot
© 2008-2010 http://www.science-mathematics.com . Program by zplan cms. Theme by wukong .