Limit x approaches 0+ ((1/x) - (1/(e^x -1)))
Favorites|Homepage
Subscriptions | sitemap
HOME > > Limit x approaches 0+ ((1/x) - (1/(e^x -1)))

Limit x approaches 0+ ((1/x) - (1/(e^x -1)))

[From: ] [author: ] [Date: 12-08-27] [Hit: ]
LHopitals Rule twice to end up with lim(x->0+)[e^x/(2*e^x + x*e^x)] = 1/2.Giving more detail,apply LHopitals, (both numerator and denominator are > 0 for x > 0).of the second application is shown above.-Remember the movie MEAN GIRLS the limit does not exist-The limit does not exist.......
Can somebody explain to me the steps to solve this. Thanks.

-
lim x -------> 0+: (1/x) - (1 / (e^x - 1)

lim x -------> 0+: (e^x - 1 - x) / (xe^x - x)

Plugging in 0 for all x values gives us an indeterminate answer of 0/0


Applying L'Hopital's Rule:

lim x -------> 0+: (e^x - 1) / (xe^x + e^x - 1)

Plugging in 0 again for all x values, we still get 0/0, thus allowing us to use L'Hopital's Rule once more:

lim x -------> 0+: (e^x) / (xe^x + 2e^x)

Plugging in 0 for all x values this time around gives us an answer of 1/2.

-
lim(x->0+) [(1/x) - (1/(e^x - 1))] = lim(x->0+)[(e^x - 1 - x)/(x*(e^x - 1))]. Now use

L'Hopital's Rule twice to end up with lim(x->0+)[e^x/(2*e^x + x*e^x)] = 1/2.

Giving more detail, note that I put the limit in the form 0/0 so that we could then
apply L'Hopital's, (both numerator and denominator are > 0 for x > 0).
The first application yields lim(x->0+)[(e^x - 1)/(e^x - 1 + x*e^x) and the result
of the second application is shown above.

-
Remember the movie MEAN GIRLS the limit does not exist

-
The limit does not exist.
1
keywords: approaches,Limit,Limit x approaches 0+ ((1/x) - (1/(e^x -1)))
New
Hot
© 2008-2010 http://www.science-mathematics.com . Program by zplan cms. Theme by wukong .