I have thought about this. For evolution to be fact, would it not have to be an unending eternal process, or phenomena ? I should be able to look out my window and see every , or some of the stages of it.
I was also looking at the fossil record . And I considered some dating back over 500 million years. But we have the same animal present today. I saw sea shells and fishes, rhinos and other animals that are the same with no change in appearance , from the ones that are alive today.
Why do we find so many animal fossils dating back over millions of years even, But there are no human remains pass 15,000 years ??? There seems to be tools, but no remains. This is odd to me. Seeing there are so many animal remains.
All these inconsistencies causes one ,to question this.
I know of adaption to environment. Or environmental changes for the cause of change, but there is nothing in the fossil record adequate to show evidence of that.
I have seen the Homo erectus exhibits. But they are just artist renditions, ideas. The skulls that are presented, give me no reason to believe they are not a prehistoric ape. When the world's most prestigious museums commission and artist and scientist to build clay and models around a ape skull , the end result is a cave man ? . If Everything evolved, what reasoning is given to believe that an skull that looks like and ape, is not just that, and ape ?
I was also looking at the fossil record . And I considered some dating back over 500 million years. But we have the same animal present today. I saw sea shells and fishes, rhinos and other animals that are the same with no change in appearance , from the ones that are alive today.
Why do we find so many animal fossils dating back over millions of years even, But there are no human remains pass 15,000 years ??? There seems to be tools, but no remains. This is odd to me. Seeing there are so many animal remains.
All these inconsistencies causes one ,to question this.
I know of adaption to environment. Or environmental changes for the cause of change, but there is nothing in the fossil record adequate to show evidence of that.
I have seen the Homo erectus exhibits. But they are just artist renditions, ideas. The skulls that are presented, give me no reason to believe they are not a prehistoric ape. When the world's most prestigious museums commission and artist and scientist to build clay and models around a ape skull , the end result is a cave man ? . If Everything evolved, what reasoning is given to believe that an skull that looks like and ape, is not just that, and ape ?
-
Actually, you can look out your window and see the effects of evolution. Dogs? They originated from wolves. Wolves and dogs are clearly different, especially when you compare it to a chihuahua. If the average person looks at a dog skull and a wolf skull there is no difference, however an expert can clearly see all the differences and point them out for you. It is the same with the 'ape' skull. To the untrained eye they may look very similar but a preffesional will be able to tell you that one is far more advanced by the slope of the forehead, the shape of the teeth, etc.
12
keywords: Fiction,or,Fact,Evolution,Evolution Fact or Fiction