Firstly, i cant spell xD OK SO...... It is possible that another universe like ours existed before us, then collapsed into the energy that caused our big bang? becuase why was the energy there? Just though about this... Im only 14 but really enjoy this space stuff and i think im pretty good at it.
-
Yes, that is possible.
A few years ago, the most popular theory among scientists is that the expansion of the universe would eventually slow down to a stop and then begin to compact and finally get to a very small point which could become a new big bang. That theory is no longer popular because scientists have found that the expansion of the universe is speeding up, not slowing down.
Even if your theory is true (and it may be), it doesn't really answer the question of why the original energy of the big bang existed. It just transfers the question to the previous big bang.
A few years ago, the most popular theory among scientists is that the expansion of the universe would eventually slow down to a stop and then begin to compact and finally get to a very small point which could become a new big bang. That theory is no longer popular because scientists have found that the expansion of the universe is speeding up, not slowing down.
Even if your theory is true (and it may be), it doesn't really answer the question of why the original energy of the big bang existed. It just transfers the question to the previous big bang.
-
First of all The Big Bang theory of the universe is wrong!
because the cosmological red shift is due to the Compton effect rather than the Doppler effect.
Reber showed that the Compton effect was the cause of the red shift in order to explain the observations of bright, very long wavelength, extragalactic radio waves. Kierein used the Compton effect explanation to explain quasars and the red shift on the sun.
Quasars are much closer than their red shift would indicate if they have an "intrinsic" red shift due to being surrounded by a 'fuzzy' atmosphere containing free electrons and other material. This concentration of electrons produces the unusual red shift as the light travels through it and loses energy to these electrons per the Compton effect. If quasars are nearby, they may even exhibit proper motion in the sky as the Earth travels around the sun. Such a proper motion has been seen.
Some quasars are double stars, with one member being an ordinary star and the other exhibiting a large red shift and being labeled as a quasar. The 100,000th Hubble Image is a good candidate for such a pair. Ken Kellerman of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory has also suggested that the red shift of quasars may be intrinsic and not an indication of their distance in a classic 1972 paper Radio Galaxies, Quasars and Cosmology published in the Astronomical Journal. A recent discovery of a quasar with a huge red shift greater than 7 has called into question whether the big bang is wrong. Most distant quasar raises questions. All problems are gone if its redshift is intrinsic.
because the cosmological red shift is due to the Compton effect rather than the Doppler effect.
Reber showed that the Compton effect was the cause of the red shift in order to explain the observations of bright, very long wavelength, extragalactic radio waves. Kierein used the Compton effect explanation to explain quasars and the red shift on the sun.
Quasars are much closer than their red shift would indicate if they have an "intrinsic" red shift due to being surrounded by a 'fuzzy' atmosphere containing free electrons and other material. This concentration of electrons produces the unusual red shift as the light travels through it and loses energy to these electrons per the Compton effect. If quasars are nearby, they may even exhibit proper motion in the sky as the Earth travels around the sun. Such a proper motion has been seen.
Some quasars are double stars, with one member being an ordinary star and the other exhibiting a large red shift and being labeled as a quasar. The 100,000th Hubble Image is a good candidate for such a pair. Ken Kellerman of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory has also suggested that the red shift of quasars may be intrinsic and not an indication of their distance in a classic 1972 paper Radio Galaxies, Quasars and Cosmology published in the Astronomical Journal. A recent discovery of a quasar with a huge red shift greater than 7 has called into question whether the big bang is wrong. Most distant quasar raises questions. All problems are gone if its redshift is intrinsic.
12
keywords: Of,Scientist,Theory,Young,Opionions,Please,Opionions Of A Theory Of A Young Scientist Please!