"Another thing is that how do you know the Soviets didn't question the lunar landings? Can you speak Russian? Were you involved with the KGB and nothing was mentioned about the lunar landings being faked?"
Can you seriously consider the possibility that the Russians would have have believed the moon landings were faked and been unable to find an English speaker to spread the news?
"Just claiming it was debunked doesn't cut it."
The fact that you don't understand the debunking is your problem, not ours.
Can you seriously consider the possibility that the Russians would have have believed the moon landings were faked and been unable to find an English speaker to spread the news?
"Just claiming it was debunked doesn't cut it."
The fact that you don't understand the debunking is your problem, not ours.
-
Apollo 13 uses technology that wasn't available in 1969. Also, just because we can now use special effects to fake something doesn't mean that it was faked. Apollo 13 shows a good depiction of that mission. That doesn't mean that Apollo 13 never happened.
No.
Science is based on asking questions. But more importantly, accepting rational answers to those questions. Not jumping onto the nearest conspiracy theory.
I the Soviets had any doubt about the lunar landing, they'd have voiced them. The landing was a major propaganda blow for them/ Why accept that if you could how it was fake? Also, why divert Luna 15, their probe launched around the same time if there was nothing there to hit it?
No.
Science is based on asking questions. But more importantly, accepting rational answers to those questions. Not jumping onto the nearest conspiracy theory.
I the Soviets had any doubt about the lunar landing, they'd have voiced them. The landing was a major propaganda blow for them/ Why accept that if you could how it was fake? Also, why divert Luna 15, their probe launched around the same time if there was nothing there to hit it?
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landin…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cosmon…
You can learn about them both from the links above. The moon landings were real (according to NASA), also they said people tried to re-create the moon landings and spread it as the real moon landing was fake, similar story to Russian KGB lunar landings. That's what I think, but its your call. Everyone thinks differently. Read them both and decide for yourself. Just because "theories" are in the name, doesn't mean they are proven to be real or exist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cosmon…
You can learn about them both from the links above. The moon landings were real (according to NASA), also they said people tried to re-create the moon landings and spread it as the real moon landing was fake, similar story to Russian KGB lunar landings. That's what I think, but its your call. Everyone thinks differently. Read them both and decide for yourself. Just because "theories" are in the name, doesn't mean they are proven to be real or exist.
-
So the closest way I could convince you would be if you went to an observatory. There are things called retroreflectors that are on the moon. When you hit them with light (ideally a laser) the light gets reflected back the same way it came. This will show up on a light sensor mounted next to the laser. However this wouldn't necessarily prove we've been to the moon, just that we've at least sent an unmanned ship to the moon with the reflectors on board.