this is really the 9/11 debate in a nutshell - the authorities have remained largely silent and offering very little information for scrutiny. Reluctance does point to deception to some degree
but again it is NOT FACT or proof- it should only produce scepticism to be open to other possibilities and too scrutinize any information or motive
in summary we will never know - I have doubts about 9/11 but it does not make them a TRUTH but from what i have seen of the event scepticism is warranted in a rational mind . The fact ( and it is a major fact ) that is there is so much scepticism around 9/11 and for the authorities not to appease it only fuels it even more . That part of it is HUMAN EMOTION equation . As scepticism will erode an authorities CONTROL and unity ....which is the base of their power ie: within a democracy if people can not trust a government then support diminishes and then they are replaced , the same is with individuals when infidelity is broken by one party within a relationship ( distrust ) then the PROBABILITY of failure is high as distrust will evolve to be a problem unless it is managed and controlled by a counter balance= appeasement
This is why i find the 9/11 debate a mild fascination is the authorities have gone against the grain of how "collectivism " works by not offering worthy counter balance for their own self preservation . This would in high probability ( not fact but scepticism ) outline CHOICES of lesser evils within a authorities priority structure of self preservation
-
Murzy say: it's a fact that Muslim extremists were on a suicide mission
-
mercedes say: You found out. Keep it to yourself of they will get you.
-
MARIE say: Oh boy.
-