-------------------------------------------------------
answers:
Paul say: Meaningless unless you define what you mean by top and bottom where there isn't a resisted gravitational field to act as a frame of reference.
-
busterwasmycat say: bottom is the farthest down that you can go. There is no "down" to space, and there is definitely no furthest down with the earth located on it and no furthest down on the surface of the earth. There is lower and higher relative to a center or some arbitrary reference plane, but no absolute bottom or top.
-
Satan Claws say: No.
-
nineteenthly say: No. There is no bottom.
-
poldi say: No.
There is no "bottom of Earth on space".
-
Nyx say: What's your frame of reference as to what is "top" and "bottom"? The only reason why north is placed at the top, is from the early European explorers and mapmakers. They placed maps with north at the "top", only because they came out of the north. And it was done for so long, and with little thought to what might be reality, that it became convention.
Without a place to reference from, direction quickly becomes irrelevant.
Take a look at how the plane of the Milky Way looks from Earth - Which way is which?
http://wallpapersafari.com/w/6L5bTZ/
-
quantumclaustrophobe say: There is no bottom.
So, yes and no.
-
Brigalow Bloke say: Of course it is.
-
laughter_every_day say: The perception of the observer would depend on the placement and orientation of the observer
-
yet-knish! say: There is no top or bottom in space.
-
Gary B say: there is no "top" or "bottom" in space
-