It wasn't unimportant to the people working on it, but the American people lost interest.
>>We can't say that USA and USSR lacked money or resources. <<
Tell that to Nixon. He was the one who cut NASAs budget and killed Apollo.
>>At the same time we can't say USA and USSR schemed with each other on this cuz we know both were unrelenting enemies.<<
True.
>>I'm pro-American but not American btw.<<
I'm not American either.
>>"a 100% successful very difficult mission that too on the first trial and never done again?"...That's him saying it.<<
Two things wrong with that, one of which I have mentioned before in that it is untrue to say it was "never done again". Also, while the whole landing on the moon was the first time in 1969, the various parts to the missions (launch, orbit, manoeuvres, docking, going outside etc) were all done time and time again. They built up experience and gradually got better and better starting with the first American in space in 1961. The Mercury and Gemini programmes did a heck of a lot of the groundwork for Apollo.
I suggest you send your friend to check out the Clavius site - it's the best site I know of for refuting the hoaxists' ridiculous and insulting claims.
EDIT
>> I gave out his religion because it is generally people from that religion who religiously deny moon-landings because of religious reasons known to them.<<
I've been tackling moon landing deniers for years and years and this is not my experience.
>> I gave you TU.<<
TU?
>> Some Americans also deny moon-landings but I'm sure very few do it for religious reasons/ cause.<<
I wish I knew exactly why they did it. It's irritating as heck.