Let me explain what I am trying to do.
I want to write an equivalancy principle something to the effect
[time]=e*[constant propagation of 1d space]
Here is what I got
(d pi/2 1/3 (lambda(x y z)^n 1/1))/(t pi/2 1/3 (lambda(x y z)^n 1/1)) = (C P^3)/n^(4-pi)
((d (Pi/2)) (CarmichaelLambda[x y z]^n/1/3))/((t (Pi/2)) (CarmichaelLambda[x y z]^n/1/3)) == (C P^3)/n^(4 - Pi)
(d (1/2 pi) 1/3 (lambda(x y z)^n 1/1))/(t (1/2 pi) 1/3 (lambda(x y z)^n 1/1)) = (C P^3)/n^(4-pi)
((d (Pi/2)) (CarmichaelLambda[x y z]^n/1/3))/((t (Pi/2)) (CarmichaelLambda[x y z]^n/1/3)) == (C P^3)/n^(4 - Pi)
But I am not sure where to go from here.
Should I introduce a second temporal dimension?
Or am I should I stick to poetry and leave the heady calculations to math wizards?
I want to write an equivalancy principle something to the effect
[time]=e*[constant propagation of 1d space]
Here is what I got
(d pi/2 1/3 (lambda(x y z)^n 1/1))/(t pi/2 1/3 (lambda(x y z)^n 1/1)) = (C P^3)/n^(4-pi)
((d (Pi/2)) (CarmichaelLambda[x y z]^n/1/3))/((t (Pi/2)) (CarmichaelLambda[x y z]^n/1/3)) == (C P^3)/n^(4 - Pi)
(d (1/2 pi) 1/3 (lambda(x y z)^n 1/1))/(t (1/2 pi) 1/3 (lambda(x y z)^n 1/1)) = (C P^3)/n^(4-pi)
((d (Pi/2)) (CarmichaelLambda[x y z]^n/1/3))/((t (Pi/2)) (CarmichaelLambda[x y z]^n/1/3)) == (C P^3)/n^(4 - Pi)
But I am not sure where to go from here.
Should I introduce a second temporal dimension?
Or am I should I stick to poetry and leave the heady calculations to math wizards?
-
Everything sounds great, I prefer continuing mathematical poetry and introduce a second temporal dimension. Keep working hard and don't forget to eat, sleep and breath.
-
If you add a few dimensions and work out the math, you might end up with Maxwell's equations, as what happened in string theory.
-
Time isn't linear. You can't map it like a line or curve.