Will it s researchers and their findings ever be accepted by the scientific community at large?
-------------------------------------------------------
answers:
Alexander say: No, we afraid of science
-
Catherine say: The ' paranormal ' things, are only the ones that have not been elucidated by science!
-
Thomas E say: With repeatable evidence, yes. I know ghosts exist, but proving it is problematic. If a roomful of doctors and scientists witnessed what I have, they may believe, but could we repeat the event for others?
-
kilroymaster say: The already have become accepted and embraced by the scientific community several centuries ago............................
-
Venus 1485AD say: I very much doubt it. There has never been any real evidence that scientists can accept, and it isn't likely that there ever will be, after all of this time with none. Ghosts don't make sense. They are a Security Belief, so some people stubbornly want to believe in them in spite of there being no valid reason to think they're real. look at English Guy and his silly comments.
-
Tom say: Depends on what it really IS. We already have physics theories that would explain the observations people call "Ghosts". Overlapping timespace, Einstein Rosen bridges connecting two different times or partly intersecting parallel universes would look EXACTLY like what people have historically (and today) call "Ghosts"---Only they didn't have the insight of Relativity Physics, and thus attributed their observations to "Spirits of the dead"
What? you may say that there is no evidence Temporal overlaps, ER bridges and parallel universes exist? The greatest Scientific minds in History have proposed them----- And people say they see what they call "ghosts"! The description of which matches Exactly what we would expect to see should some natural glitch or perturbation disrupt local timespace.