What is the stupidest point you have heard from a creationist
Favorites|Homepage
Subscriptions | sitemap
HOME > > What is the stupidest point you have heard from a creationist

What is the stupidest point you have heard from a creationist

[From: ] [author: ] [Date: 13-05-04] [Hit: ]
who, with his imbecile sidekick Kirk Cameron, said that because a banana fits in our hand so well, it must mean that we were intelligently designed to eat bananas.Theres a You Tube video showing these jokers saying this in some creationist video.-What is the meaning of life?......
There are so many arguments they make and I have yet to meet a single creationist who even understands how evolution/natural selection works. Sometimes it makes me want to tear my hair out. What do you think the stupidest ones are?

-
There's that one idiot, Ray Comfort I think, who, with his imbecile sidekick Kirk Cameron, said that because a banana fits in our hand so well, it must mean that we were intelligently designed to eat bananas.

There's a You Tube video showing these jokers saying this in some creationist video.

-
What is the meaning of life? Does living in a world that is the result of random chance serve a purpose? Is it possible for random chance to produce artifacts that appear to have had a designer? Thousands of monkeys with typewriters have not been successful reproducing the works of Shakesphere, what makes you think that random chance can create life. As a creationist I have no debate with micro-evolution, the adaptation of species which Darwin documented and studied in his time in Galapagos. The hypothesis asserted without proof is the jump from one species to the creation of a new more complex species, or more particularly the random creation of initial species from raw materials.. Evolution that produces higher complexity and greater order with time violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics... order should be decreasing with time, by natural law chaos always wins. Also counter to Evolution is the Cambrian Explosion; if the mechanism of creation of life is random chance, why were the dice stacked to create so much life in this time period? So much of the life we see appears miraculously well designed for a purpose, and occam's razor / KISS principle leads us toward the simplest explanation, that if it appears designed, there must have been a designer of much greater capability than ourselves and we call him God and are thankful and praise him for all the gifts he has given us including the free will to choose not to believe in him but still enjoy everything that he has designed for your benefit.

-
most people (~95%) don't understand evolution/natural selection, including many atheists as well.
i don't really blame them for not understanding it, as it is a hard subject,
but what i don't understand is when people try to prove it wrong without even knowing what it is/means.

Evolution is actually pretty amazing, and one of my favorite topics in biology, so it pisses me off when people say false things about it.

-
Literally everything Eric Hovind says.

Presuppositionalism is sheer idiocy.

-
Pick one.

-
It''s in the bible, it must be true
1
keywords: creationist,you,is,stupidest,from,point,have,heard,What,the,What is the stupidest point you have heard from a creationist
New
Hot
© 2008-2010 http://www.science-mathematics.com . Program by zplan cms. Theme by wukong .