So like how did the universe start?
How did something come out of nothing?
Whats nothing?
Am i really here?:O
OMG im having a panic attack
CB i need a friend who's a geek.
Peaceeeeeeeee!
How did something come out of nothing?
Whats nothing?
Am i really here?:O
OMG im having a panic attack
CB i need a friend who's a geek.
Peaceeeeeeeee!
-
Don't worry, we physicists don't understand it either :p
-
The origin of the components of the universe is unknown to science.
Many point to the big bang as the origin of everything, but the big bang does not address the issue of origin. It is the process of expansion and is still visibly in progress.
The evidence found so far does not indicate the origin of the components for the universe, nor does the evidence tell us anything of events occurring before its expansion. Rather than repeatedly reciting this qualifying sentence, the big bang is often simply referred to (incorrectly) as the beginning or "creation" of the universe. Television documentaries do not bother to make the distinction. Though not technically correct, for most practical discussions of the physics of the universe, this is okay. For discussions on the origin of the universe, the error is unacceptable.
Guesses and ideas on the origin of the universe are plentiful but scientifically unsubstantiated. There are many religions that have their own explanation although most reject all other explanations but their own.
► Although some suggestions have the start of the big bang as the start of the universe, I don't know of any scientific requirement for or against an infinitely long past.
.
Many point to the big bang as the origin of everything, but the big bang does not address the issue of origin. It is the process of expansion and is still visibly in progress.
The evidence found so far does not indicate the origin of the components for the universe, nor does the evidence tell us anything of events occurring before its expansion. Rather than repeatedly reciting this qualifying sentence, the big bang is often simply referred to (incorrectly) as the beginning or "creation" of the universe. Television documentaries do not bother to make the distinction. Though not technically correct, for most practical discussions of the physics of the universe, this is okay. For discussions on the origin of the universe, the error is unacceptable.
Guesses and ideas on the origin of the universe are plentiful but scientifically unsubstantiated. There are many religions that have their own explanation although most reject all other explanations but their own.
► Although some suggestions have the start of the big bang as the start of the universe, I don't know of any scientific requirement for or against an infinitely long past.
.
-
Look up the multiverse bubble theory. Remember we once thought that the solar system was all there was then the galaxy now we know there may be different universes. The multiverse could be eternal but our finite universe could have “bubbled” off of another one. You don’t remember anything before you were born but your parents do and so on and so forth.
-
the universe started with a panic attack. nothing panicked which caused something to come into existence. you think therefore you are. nothing is the opposite of something. you don't have enough info to answer the question so why worry about it? relax and enjoy the little things.
-
No one knows. There are several hypotheses, but as usual the reality probably blows them all out of the water. Rarely do ideas about how something works turn out to be true long before any evidence for it is even discovered.