-------------------------------------------------------
answers:
miyuki & kyojin say: No, cannot even reach nearest star, certainly never colonize galaxy, let alone universe
-
Athena say: Only if we can "fold space."
-
Poseidon say: Extremely unlikely.
Although I am positive that within the next 8000 years man will have developed the technology to find and inhabit habitable planets it will be impossible to colonize the 'whole' universe.
There are billions if not trillions of stars in the Universe and orbiting them are trillions of planets Although there may be millions of habitable planets it will be a physical impossibility to colonize all of them.
Mainly because they first have to discover them and secondly be able to reach them.
There are at least 200 billion stars in the Milky Way alone and orbiting them goodness knows how many planets.
Poseidon
-
quantumclaustrophobe say: At our current rate.... no.
-
poornakumar b say: Lat's hope so. But why?
-
Newdivide1701 say: It depends on the methods used to even reach the outer areas of the universe. Right now we only have conjecture on how it might be achievable with such phenomenon like wormholes.
Right now the only thing we have that can allow us to reach the nearest star systems is the warp drive and right now that's still on the drawing board.
-
Donut Tim say: No, sorry.
Not possible.
-
Starrysky say: Hard to predict outcome of an election even the day of it. How to tell that far ahead?
In all probability, there will be no travel to another stellar system. Just too far, too expensive, too dangerous. Not enough benefit to justify actual people traveling. Maybe just a dialog with others by radio.
-
Morningfox say: In 10,000 years, I doubt that humans will have reached more than a handful of stars.
-
L. E. Gant say: No.
Even in the extended series, they still have not explored the whole of our galaxy.
-
PhotonX say: Not unless we can figure out how to teleport spaceships across the cosmos by using psychoactive drugs. What do you think the chances of that happening are?
.
.
-