Hello everyone...
i'd like to ask those who are specialized in astrophysics or theoretical physics to provide me if possible with links, books, references, or article accessible to the public for mathematical proof of the universe...I'm Engineer and applied mathematician, and i keep hearing there is a proof for such speculation from the atheists arrogant assertions, i'd like to see those numbers.
i'd like to ask those who are specialized in astrophysics or theoretical physics to provide me if possible with links, books, references, or article accessible to the public for mathematical proof of the universe...I'm Engineer and applied mathematician, and i keep hearing there is a proof for such speculation from the atheists arrogant assertions, i'd like to see those numbers.
-
There is none.
-
The Multi-verse or Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics is exactly that a "Interpretation" a mental picture of what goes on at the quantum scale. There are over 20 Interpretations:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretat…
None may be "reality" but they do accurately describe what goes on at the quantum scale. Proof? No. But, it does work to explain what we observe.
By the Campbell Test it is a valid view:
"The rigor of a science is directly proportional to its ability to predict" - John C. Campbell
“By 1928 or so, many of the mathematical formulas and rules of quantum mechanics had been put in place and, ever since, it has been used to make the most precise and successful numerical predictions in the history of science. But in a real sense those who use QM find themselves following rules and formulas laid down by the ‘Founding Fathers’ of the theory…. Without really understanding why the procedures work or what they really mean. ….
What are we to make of all this? Does it mean that on a microscopic level the universe operated in ways so obscure and unfamiliar that the human mind, evolved over eons with phenomena on familiar everyday scales, is unable to fully grasp what really goes on? Or, might it mean that through historical accident physicists have constructed an extremely awkward formulation of QM that, although quantitatively successful, obfuscates the true nature of reality? No one knows.” – Brian Greene, The Elegant Universe
'I think it is safe to say that no one understands quantum mechanics'. Richard Feynman If anyone understood QM it would be Richard Feynman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretat…
None may be "reality" but they do accurately describe what goes on at the quantum scale. Proof? No. But, it does work to explain what we observe.
By the Campbell Test it is a valid view:
"The rigor of a science is directly proportional to its ability to predict" - John C. Campbell
“By 1928 or so, many of the mathematical formulas and rules of quantum mechanics had been put in place and, ever since, it has been used to make the most precise and successful numerical predictions in the history of science. But in a real sense those who use QM find themselves following rules and formulas laid down by the ‘Founding Fathers’ of the theory…. Without really understanding why the procedures work or what they really mean. ….
What are we to make of all this? Does it mean that on a microscopic level the universe operated in ways so obscure and unfamiliar that the human mind, evolved over eons with phenomena on familiar everyday scales, is unable to fully grasp what really goes on? Or, might it mean that through historical accident physicists have constructed an extremely awkward formulation of QM that, although quantitatively successful, obfuscates the true nature of reality? No one knows.” – Brian Greene, The Elegant Universe
'I think it is safe to say that no one understands quantum mechanics'. Richard Feynman If anyone understood QM it would be Richard Feynman
-
physics does not work the same way as mathematics- there are no 'proof's . This is why Gravity is still a "theory"
Speculation about multiverse is based on cosmic background radiation studies
Speculation about multiverse is based on cosmic background radiation studies