Why do certain people still reject the existences of ghosts--even with solid, documented evidences

It's not because they are stupid like they sound some time...ah hem..not mentioning any names but they just haven't had a real, no doubt about it, experience with them. Once you have there is no doubt.

Critical thinkers never get to experience ghosts. We are just as human as everyone else. Does this type of thinking scare the ghosts? Noticed you dropped the other question.

Report Abuse

cuz to them that is just made up, they are skeptical, and will refuse to believe that some things are true (truth is alot of videos and pics. ARE fakes) but there are spirits, if u r my frind n are willing to hear and be open minded with me and my house, u will relize just how real they are, if u are a true frind and can actually look at me and notice the truth in my eyes u will know, spirits are 100% real, besides wat else do u think happens after u die, u become worm food?

chrystal is 100% correct, u can tell the difference between real and fake :P

btw the million $ thing is total BS!!!! he is just some dumbo trying to make fun of beleivers for not having "any evidence" and anyone who agrees is just as rude, im not trying to be mean, i am just trying to make a point :P

Can you clearly define exactly what a ghost is? If so please do so, along with what they can and can not do.

Is this "evidence" good enough for you to win the Randi million?


"If you are in possession of this revolutionary secret of science, why not prove it and be hailed as the new Newton? Of course, we know the answer. You can't do it. You are a fake."
Richard Dawkins

That's the trouble - the evidence is NOT solid, with questionable documentation.

Why not simply produce a real ghost? Then, there would be nothing to be questioned.

yeah there was even that documentary about this one ghost named Casper