How do you explain the photographs of Aldrin on the moon that look like they are lit in a studio

Actually, they DON"T look like they were shot in a studio.
That is one of the problems.
The "Conspiracy Theorists," like the ones in the JFK assassination, rely of "Hollywood" science and not real science.

Look up the "Myth Busters " episode on this (moon not JFK) and watch it. THEY use REAL science.

Now, the story about Hillary and Bill Clinton being the same person . . . THAT one is real.

see the text surrounding the picture? that seems to explain it sufficiently. I don't know how to explain why you think that it looks like it was lit in a studio, though. maybe you don't know that much about photography?

Then again, you to can look at the actual photographs and other data generated by those missions -
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Histor…

Go to the moon, and take similar photos. Compare them to what the astronauts brought back. If it looks like they were 'taken with studio lighting' - then, let us know. We'll take it from there.

I suggest you buy a child's primer on photography. I doubt you will understand anything more complex.

The photo on the Clavius web site already provides all the explanations.

NASA diddled with the photos in 1984 in order to give psychotics and fools something to obsess over

ZZZZZZZZZZ.......... the moon landings are indisputable fact. end of story.

What you need is sex, and lots of it

Did you actually READ the text on the page you linked to? I'm betting that you didn't, because that page gives an excellent and detailed refutation of the claims about the lighting in that picture. That link is to a web site put together by one of the Top Contributors on Yahoo!Answers, Clavius, and is one of the three links I always give when answering questions about the Moon landings. I'm simply amazed that you could link to a page which actually answers all your questions in detail!

The moon landings were not faked, they were real. However, the Apollo 13 "crisis" was faked.

After the successful precision landing and subsequent mission of Apollo12, (except for Pete Conrad ruining the TV camera by pointing it at the sun), the American public did what they always do, got bored and lost interest. Something had to be done to get the interest back.

The something was the Apollo 13 crisis. You have to salute Jim Lovell and his crew. They really took one for the team by giving up their moon landing.