Scientists claim to know the age of the Earth, but do they have absolute proof, leaving no doubt.
Is carbon dating without flaws?
Is carbon dating without flaws?
-
There is no absolute, 100% accurate way to prove earth's age, but through a process called carbon dating, and looking at the atomic decay of elemental particles, scientists have hypothesized that the earth is close to 4.73 billion years old.
-
Carbon dating IS NOT how the age of the Solar System or the Earth has been determined C14 has a VERY short half-life. Radiometric data ting has it's flaws, but yes, there is indisputable scientific proof with a margin of error about how old Earth is using uranium and thorium and rare earth radiometric dating. FORGET ABOUT CARBON DATING. It's useful for archaeological dating, but not dating the how old Earth is.
Here's your evidence. IF you had bothered to open the link you would have seen it alreadyh. I DESISE spoon feeding data to paranolid trolls who will not even lift their paranolid fingers enolught to op;en a liknk:
"Table 1 - Half-lives of various long-lived radioactive isotopes
Isotope t1/2 (years)
Samarium-146 103,000,000
Uranium-236 234,200,000
Uranium-235 703,800,000
Potassium-40 1,280,000,000
Uranium-238 4,468,000,000
Rubidium-87 4,750,000,000
Thorium-232 14,100,000,000
Lutetium-176 37,800,000,000
Rhenium-187 43,500,000,000
Lanthanium-138 105,000,000,000
Samarium-147 106,000,000,000 ..."
http://astro.berkeley.edu/~dperley/univa…
I DARE YOU to OPEN THE LINK. You might actually LEARN something new.
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/age.ht…
Here's your evidence. IF you had bothered to open the link you would have seen it alreadyh. I DESISE spoon feeding data to paranolid trolls who will not even lift their paranolid fingers enolught to op;en a liknk:
"Table 1 - Half-lives of various long-lived radioactive isotopes
Isotope t1/2 (years)
Samarium-146 103,000,000
Uranium-236 234,200,000
Uranium-235 703,800,000
Potassium-40 1,280,000,000
Uranium-238 4,468,000,000
Rubidium-87 4,750,000,000
Thorium-232 14,100,000,000
Lutetium-176 37,800,000,000
Rhenium-187 43,500,000,000
Lanthanium-138 105,000,000,000
Samarium-147 106,000,000,000 ..."
http://astro.berkeley.edu/~dperley/univa…
I DARE YOU to OPEN THE LINK. You might actually LEARN something new.
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/age.ht…
-
Carbon dating is irrelevant to the age of the Earth. It's only used for dating organic remains less than 60,000 years old.
I have some granite that is about 3.5 billion years old according to the uranium decay chain. The margin of error on that figure is about 1%, given that the zircon crystals contain two different Uranium isotopes that can be dated in that fashion. Metamorphosis can give erroneous dates, but this piece has never been metamorphosed.
I have some granite that is about 3.5 billion years old according to the uranium decay chain. The margin of error on that figure is about 1%, given that the zircon crystals contain two different Uranium isotopes that can be dated in that fashion. Metamorphosis can give erroneous dates, but this piece has never been metamorphosed.
12
keywords: Is,scientific,of,Earths,evidence,age,there,absolute,indisputable,Is there absolute indisputable scientific evidence of Earths age