Complex analysis-series
Favorites|Homepage
Subscriptions | sitemap
HOME > > Complex analysis-series

Complex analysis-series

[From: ] [author: ] [Date: 12-08-09] [Hit: ]
with F(z0) = G(z0).By shifting your functions to f(z) = F(z+z0), and g(z) = G(z+z0), you may assume that z0 = 0.Let h(z) = f(z) - g(z).Then h(z) vanishes on your subset of G,......
Prove that if two analytic functions in a region G coincide on a subset of G, which has an accumulation point of G, then agree on all points of G.
Thanks for your help

-
Let F(z) and G(z) be your two functions, and let z0 be your accumulation point, with F(z0) = G(z0). By shifting your functions to f(z) = F(z+z0), and g(z) = G(z+z0), you may assume that z0 = 0.

Let h(z) = f(z) - g(z). Then h(z) vanishes on your subset of G, and h(0) = 0. It suffices to show that h(z) vanishes on all of G.

Since h(z) is analytic write out it's power series: h(z) = ∑ a(n)z^n with n>0. Let a(m) be the first non zero term in this series. Then h(z) = a(m)z^m + z^(m+1)∑ a(n)z^(n-m-1) with n> m. Note that ∑ a(n)z^(n-m-1) converges, so let M = max |∑ a(n)z^(n-m-1)| on your subset.

Select z's in your subset close enough to 0 so that |Mz| < |a(m)|*e where e is arbitrary (this can be done since 0 is an accumulation point of your subset). Then |h(z)| > |a(m)z^m| - |z^(m+1)∑ a(n)z^(n-m-1)| > 0 contradicting that h(z) is uniformly 0 on your subset.
1
keywords: Complex,series,analysis,Complex analysis-series
New
Hot
© 2008-2010 http://www.science-mathematics.com . Program by zplan cms. Theme by wukong .