What people views on the face on mars?
Why dont take more pictures and,check out the area
More....
Why dont take more pictures and,check out the area
More....
-
Mars was once like Our Earth. But now, it is abandoned and it has no Atmosphere. Scientists think that Mars could have had living things before Earth. But that's not really confirmed.
If Mars was once like Earth, it might be looked like Watery planet. If Water was present in Mars, it could have had reefs and landscapes under the Ocean. The Face on Mars is one of the Landscape of Mars, which reminds that it could have had oceans.
It is one of the Best Outer Space illusion. We make up our mind to think what is more familiar to what we see...
Hope that Helps :)
If Mars was once like Earth, it might be looked like Watery planet. If Water was present in Mars, it could have had reefs and landscapes under the Ocean. The Face on Mars is one of the Landscape of Mars, which reminds that it could have had oceans.
It is one of the Best Outer Space illusion. We make up our mind to think what is more familiar to what we see...
Hope that Helps :)
-
That's the Cydonia region. Low-resolution photos in the 1970s happened to be taken when the light happened to be at just the right angle to amplify some natural bumps on a hill in a way that looks like a face to our eyes. Of course, our brains are wired to look for these kinds of patterns (see pareidolia below), so we see a face when we see anything with even a passing resemblance to one.
Richard Hoagland took the "face" on Mars and ran with it; he's been the main purveyor of this particular bit of woo. He's taken it several steps farther. His thing is to blow up images way beyond their resolution, and make fanciful claims about what he sees in the distorted pictures. "Aliens on the Moon" proponents do the same thing with "spaceships" they see in blown-up pictures of the surface of the far side of the Moon.
We have been back to Mars and taken much higher-res images. It turns out to be much less impressive in higher resolution.
Richard Hoagland took the "face" on Mars and ran with it; he's been the main purveyor of this particular bit of woo. He's taken it several steps farther. His thing is to blow up images way beyond their resolution, and make fanciful claims about what he sees in the distorted pictures. "Aliens on the Moon" proponents do the same thing with "spaceships" they see in blown-up pictures of the surface of the far side of the Moon.
We have been back to Mars and taken much higher-res images. It turns out to be much less impressive in higher resolution.
-
They did take more photos. They found it was an ordinary rock formation that when the light was at just the right angle and when the computer filled in the details of the digitally sent photos it appeared to be a face, but there really wasn't anything there.