Why do atheists keep using their stuipid guess theorys to explain the universe

I believe roger penrose has drastically underestimated the number of protons and neurons on the planet earth. considering each single human body contains around
7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0… carbon atoms.. containing an average of 4.2*10 to the 27th power Protons and 4.2*10 to the 27th Neurons each x (roughly) 7 billion people..

thats 7*(10*27) x (4.2*(10*27)) + (4.2*(10*27)) x 7,000,000,000 = X. X accounting for the atom makeup of only the carbon composition of the known human population.. you obviously see I get a pretty extraordinary number of just carbon atoms in people and have yet to account for the atom makeup of any other mineral in the human body, or any mineral of anything that exists on this planet including the mineral makeup of the planet itself.

do you still believe that 10 to the 10125 is far greater than the number of existing protons and neurons in the universe?? you do realize the size of the universe don't you? I'm sure we could write 10*(10*10123) on every proton and neuron in our galaxy alone.


good try tho.

I think the definition of "stupid" is not knowing what you're talking about. You are a prime example of exactly that:

1. Atheism is simply not believing in the existence of god. That's any of the hundreds of gods invented by Mankind. Atheism has no opinion on Evolution or any other scientific theory.

2. Stating that a theory in any way relates to a "guess" simply displays a singular lack of education. A scientific theory is required to fit every single known and verifiable fact and be capable of predicting further verifiable facts. A single fact that doesn't fit a scientific theory would be enough to bring down the whole theory. In the 150 years since Origin of Species was first published no such fact has ever been demonstrated

3. "It has been calculated that the probability of an environment suited to life emerging through an explosion such as the Big Bang are 1 in 10 x 10123" Not by any thinking scientist it hasn't. To do so ignores the basic mechanism of evolution. Evolution acts cumulatively over vastly long periods of time. At no point does evolution require an organism or an organ to spontaneously "evolve" out of nothing (this is what deluded creationists believe and the only way to make it work is to invent a supernatural magician to make it happen).