it states (at least in the dimensions we live in), that energy is directly proportional to mass with speed of light squared (c) as a constant.This means that sub-atomic particles that travel close to the speed of light and thus will have a significantly higher energy there will be a noticable increase in their mass.-Why would you expect anyone here to be smarter than Hawkin ?You have some strange ideas about the people on Yahoo!You can list a thousand questions asking why some facet of physics is the way it is,......
The Higgs boson is supposed to be the endower of this attribute; it is what determines if a particle can glide along effortlessly like a photon or if it must trudge like a hefty proton. The trouble is that nobody knows exactly what a Higgs boson is like or even if it really exists. It must be extremely heavy, or other lower-energy facilities, like Fermilab outside Chicago, would already have detected it. But it cannot be too heavy, or the theories that predict its existence would not work.
E = mc^2.
Though the equation is being challenged, it states (at least in the dimensions we live in), that energy is directly proportional to mass with speed of light squared (c) as a constant.
This means that sub-atomic particles that travel close to the speed of light and thus will have a significantly higher energy there will be a noticable increase in their mass.
