Questioning the sustainability of the Scientific and Mathematical evidence provided for the veracity of the Koranic textual origin.
1. Scientific evidence for the veracity of the Koranic textual origin, not provided.
1a. Example: Supernatural Embryological Data.
1b. Example: Supernatural Astrophysical Data.
2. Mathematical evidence for the veracity of the Koranic textual origin, not provided.
2a. Example: Statistical impossibility of numerical repetitions (of, Chapters, Verses, Words and Phrases).
Source: http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ (Credited Source)
Main Point: The Scientific and Mathematical evidence provided for the veracity of the Koranic textual origin are simply alleged and not factual. Due to the fact that none of these Islamic claims (of, Science and Math) are supported by peer-review &/o credited scholarship publications, &/o accepted by credited scholarship, they must be classified and rejected [1, 2, 3]
1. Pseudomathematics.
2. Pseudoscience.
3. Bastardisation of Data.
Personal note: I am not attacking or trying to insult respectful Muslims, Islam. I am simply stating a fact. I have analyzed these supernatural claims personally, it must be said, these claims are false. One counter point, the same claims (of, Science and Math) can be established with other ancient/modern texts, it is not unique for the Koranic text.
Question: Why do Muslims acknowledged supernatural scientific and mathematical data in the Koranic text without provided, academically demonstrated and criticized, well established evidence based upon objectively reasonable conclusions? In short, why do Muslims acknowledge these would-be supernatural data on the Koranic text formulated in hearsay?
Thank You.
1. Scientific evidence for the veracity of the Koranic textual origin, not provided.
1a. Example: Supernatural Embryological Data.
1b. Example: Supernatural Astrophysical Data.
2. Mathematical evidence for the veracity of the Koranic textual origin, not provided.
2a. Example: Statistical impossibility of numerical repetitions (of, Chapters, Verses, Words and Phrases).
Source: http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ (Credited Source)
Main Point: The Scientific and Mathematical evidence provided for the veracity of the Koranic textual origin are simply alleged and not factual. Due to the fact that none of these Islamic claims (of, Science and Math) are supported by peer-review &/o credited scholarship publications, &/o accepted by credited scholarship, they must be classified and rejected [1, 2, 3]
1. Pseudomathematics.
2. Pseudoscience.
3. Bastardisation of Data.
Personal note: I am not attacking or trying to insult respectful Muslims, Islam. I am simply stating a fact. I have analyzed these supernatural claims personally, it must be said, these claims are false. One counter point, the same claims (of, Science and Math) can be established with other ancient/modern texts, it is not unique for the Koranic text.
Question: Why do Muslims acknowledged supernatural scientific and mathematical data in the Koranic text without provided, academically demonstrated and criticized, well established evidence based upon objectively reasonable conclusions? In short, why do Muslims acknowledge these would-be supernatural data on the Koranic text formulated in hearsay?
Thank You.
-
eh?