Is T onto? Explain (attempt inside)
Favorites|Homepage
Subscriptions | sitemap
HOME > > Is T onto? Explain (attempt inside)

Is T onto? Explain (attempt inside)

[From: ] [author: ] [Date: 11-11-22] [Hit: ]
So I first found out that T(1,1) would be, which came out to be (2,3,so (2,3,......
Let T:R^2 -> R^3 be defined by T(a,b) = (a+b, a+2b, 2a + 3b)

is T onto?

So I first found out that T(1,1) would be, which came out to be (2,3,5)
so (2,3,5) is in the range of T. Then I asked myself if (2,4,6) would be in the range of T.

so I put it in matrix form after I equated it to (2,4,6)
a + b =2
a + 2b=4
2a+3b=6

after I put it in matrix form and reduced it, I got
1st row = (1 0 0 )
2nd row = (0 1 2)
3rd row= (0 0 0 )

Does this mean that it's not onto because there are only 2 non-zero rows implying that it's not in R^3?

I'm confused as to see why this is not onto (answer is in the back of the book which says it's not onto)

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

-
First we see how the standard unit vectors transform under the transformation T.

T(e1)=(1,1,2)
T(e2)=(1,2,3)

Therefore the matrix representation of T wrt the standard basis is:

A=
[1 1]
[1 2]
[2 3]

By row reducing this matrix we see that

rref(A)=
[1 0]
[0 1]
[0 0]

So we can see that rankA=2 and therefore dimR(A) (dimension of the column space of A) is rankA = 2. dimR^3 = 3 < 2 which implies that R(A) is a strict subset of R^3 (ie does not equal R^3) and therefore the columns of A do not span R^3

Therefore T is not onto //
1
keywords: inside,onto,attempt,Explain,Is,Is T onto? Explain (attempt inside)
New
Hot
© 2008-2010 http://www.science-mathematics.com . Program by zplan cms. Theme by wukong .