I heard a very good point against evolution

In order for evolution to happen to all the species on earth from a one celled organism, would take trillions of useful changes. In order for the changes to occur within the last 6 billions years, there would have to be multiple adaptations everyday day.. But science itself says it takes hundreds of thousands of years to evolve slightly. The time frame doesnt work for evolution.

>>>In order for evolution to happen<<<

No. Evolution is just change over time. More precisely, it is the change in allele frequency in a population between generations. This happens. This is measured. This is not in doubt.

>>>to all the species on earth from a one celled organism<<<

The evidence supports the model of a common, universal ancestor to all known life.

>>>would take trillions of useful changes.<<<

You haven't specified what you mean by changes so the number is meaningless.

>>>In order for the changes to occur within the last 6 billions years,<<<

That's an odd age to pick. The current accepted age of the earth is ~4.5 billion years. The oldest signs of singled cell life is ~3.4 billion years old.

>>> there would have to be multiple adaptations everyday day<<<

Mutations happen. Every time DNA is copied, there are mutations. Rare but mutation rates are measurable.

>>>But science itself says<<<

I think you have to be more careful of where you get your science news. This is something that would be found on a scientifically illiterate religious site.

>>> it takes hundreds of thousands of years to evolve slightly.<<<

Evolution change in allele frequency in a population between generations. So the rate of evolution depends on generation time. I can see evolution overnight in bacteria and viruses. In days in eukaryotic cells.

>>> The time frame doesnt work for evolution.<<<

So, to answer your question: No, it is not a point against the theory of evolution.