If evolution is real, why aren't there any fish that 'evolved' to breathe air

Think about it. A fish that had lungs would be able to crawl out of the water and look on land to see if there were anything good to eat, like fish food. But the last time I was at the beach, I didn't see any of these 'fish-lungs' coming out of the water. Explain that away, evolutionists!

There are:

You mean like... lungfish (sarcopterygii, dipnoi) found in Africa, South America, or Australia? Or maybe you mean rockskippers, leaping blennies (alticus arnoldorum), wooly sculpin, mudskippers (oxudercinae), over a dozen species of eels, various snake head fish, labyrinth fish (anabantoidei), etc., etc.

If you want to see a lung fish coming out of the water... I recommend Southern Queensland. Any kid around Brisbane should be able to find one for you in about twenty minutes. Maybe if you ask nicely you can join a 4th-grade field trip and get the kids to explain evolution to you?

That is exactly what happened and that is why there are animals that have adapted to the inter-tidal zone and, eventually to living on land.

Think about it. Other than claiming that a bearded old Jewish guy did it, evolution is the only logical explanation.

Of course, the fact that YOU did not see anything is certainly not sufficient proof for the rest of us. For all we know, you could be blind.

There are many tropical fish that can breath both air and in water but only move during droughts and floods there are no fish such as crocodiles and dolphins who breath air and whales but ther nodus have progressed in the water where as there land walking ancestors where either run out because they where unable to survive or many other variables so yes there are air breathing and land walking fish

Want to know something funny?

The swim bladder that bony fish have is evolved from a lung. So... the fish looked out on land, didn't like it, and repurposed the lung for underwater use.