A question for atheists about the origins of life and the universe

I understand how some people think the concept of a creator is far fetched. What I don't get is why they think the big bang theory has more credit. I mean I have a fairly scientific mind, and have doubted the bible myself. But after researching it, I found some pretty credible support:

#1 The Bible flawlessly teaches the exact same themes despite being written in different languages by 40 different people from all over the world, many of which were not even aware of each other or living at the same time (it was written over a period of 1400-1800 years) Such unified content seems statistically impossible without some outside and unifying source.

#2 Many things were accurately predicted, not just Jesus related things but historically things like the fall of Rome.

#3 Scientific things about earth were in the Bible hundreds of years before man discovered them (like the earth being round and how the water cycle works.)

Even after all that, I admit I can't technically prove it. So why do atheists think I am a fool? Can they prove the big band theory? I personally find the idea of everything exploding from a ball the size of a grape to be extremely far fetched. I understand that the universe seems to have spread out from one source, but couldn't that be creation? Either way, why am I the fool if atheists are claiming to know something as fact which they can't prove?

have you ever thought about the fact that no one has seen god?

and yet, people are still believing in it? how foolish is that?

also, what makes you think that the god from the bible is the one true god and that Zeus is a fake god?

ignorance is bliss. and your avatar perfectly shows it.

#1 What version, exactly ??? (see link - there have been many different versions of 'The Bible' ... after 2,000 years or so of revision, you would EXPECT the Catholic Church to have 'got it right' ...)