the answer is there is no answer.
Moreover this question must be followed by another question, the context of which is unrelated to the first interrogation. What you have done is present one side of a pair of questions which is like presenting one side of a dichotomy pair or stating a cause without stating the effect. It is like expecting to have a gravitating body having no inertia or vice-versa, see ?
There is probably a description of this in the arts of grammar which I dont know but I think you get the idea !!
Moreover this question must be followed by another question, the context of which is unrelated to the first interrogation. What you have done is present one side of a pair of questions which is like presenting one side of a dichotomy pair or stating a cause without stating the effect. It is like expecting to have a gravitating body having no inertia or vice-versa, see ?
There is probably a description of this in the arts of grammar which I dont know but I think you get the idea !!
-
Ah, this is much like the question: True of False? This statement is false.
The answer is: there is no answer, because there is no question. Just as the sentence above cannot be true or false since it does not express an idea, the sentence you posed does not express a question.
The answer is: there is no answer, because there is no question. Just as the sentence above cannot be true or false since it does not express an idea, the sentence you posed does not express a question.
-
yes, you can in fact do this. however i would not recommend it because of the high risks involved.
-
Trick question!
-
Yes...
-
no