I really enjoy ones made by Ray Comfort, Kirk Cameron, and Kent Hovind, because they have no idea what they're talking about. Oh, and I enjoy the one about how peanut butter disproves abiogenesis (which they referred to as evolution). I don't know who said that one though.
If you don't know their arguments, they are:
Ray Comfort & Kirk Cameron (they work together) - the only way to prove evolution is by proving the existence (or past existence) of a combination of two modern species, ie. the crocoduck.
Kent Hovind - there are 5 theories of evolution, which include the Big Bang theory, abiogenesis, one element changing into another, micro, and macroevolution.
The peanut butter one - a closed jar of peanut butter contains many proteins, like the early Earth did, but it doesn't produce new life. This means evolution can't be true!
What are yours?
If you don't know their arguments, they are:
Ray Comfort & Kirk Cameron (they work together) - the only way to prove evolution is by proving the existence (or past existence) of a combination of two modern species, ie. the crocoduck.
Kent Hovind - there are 5 theories of evolution, which include the Big Bang theory, abiogenesis, one element changing into another, micro, and macroevolution.
The peanut butter one - a closed jar of peanut butter contains many proteins, like the early Earth did, but it doesn't produce new life. This means evolution can't be true!
What are yours?
-
"Oh, and I enjoy the one about how peanut butter disproves abiogenesis (which they referred to as evolution). I don't know who said that one though."
Chuck Missler, I believe his name is.
There are so many Creationist fallacies, strawmen, and combinations thereof.
1) Evolution violates the law of entropy (<- their term, by the way).
2) The law of biogenesis refutes evolution.
3) If humans evolved from chimps, then why are there still chimps?
4) No mutations are beneficial.
5) There are no missing links (<- their term, by the way).
6) Darwin was racist.
7) Evolution is atheistic.
8) It's impossible to add new genetic information to genomes.
9) Evolution is stupid ... did you ever see a dog give birth to a cat?
10) Archaeopteryx was a fraud.
11) Evolution? You mean EVILution!
12) Evolution is JUST A THEORY!
13) It takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in God.
14) A growing number of leading scientists are rejecting evolution; it's on its last legs.
15) Creation has more evidence than evolution does.
16) If a princess kisses a frog and it turns into a man that's called a fairy tale; but if the same thing happens over millions of years, suddenly its called science?!?!?
Chuck Missler, I believe his name is.
There are so many Creationist fallacies, strawmen, and combinations thereof.
1) Evolution violates the law of entropy (<- their term, by the way).
2) The law of biogenesis refutes evolution.
3) If humans evolved from chimps, then why are there still chimps?
4) No mutations are beneficial.
5) There are no missing links (<- their term, by the way).
6) Darwin was racist.
7) Evolution is atheistic.
8) It's impossible to add new genetic information to genomes.
9) Evolution is stupid ... did you ever see a dog give birth to a cat?
10) Archaeopteryx was a fraud.
11) Evolution? You mean EVILution!
12) Evolution is JUST A THEORY!
13) It takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in God.
14) A growing number of leading scientists are rejecting evolution; it's on its last legs.
15) Creation has more evidence than evolution does.
16) If a princess kisses a frog and it turns into a man that's called a fairy tale; but if the same thing happens over millions of years, suddenly its called science?!?!?
-
It could have been Poe's Law, but:
"One of the most basic laws in the universe is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This states that as time goes by, entropy in an environment will increase. Evolution argues differently against a law that is accepted everywhere by everyone. Evolution says that we started out simple, and over time became more complex. That just isn't possible unless there is a giant outside source of energy supplying the Earth with huge amounts of energy. If there were such a source, scientists would certainly know about it."
"One of the most basic laws in the universe is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This states that as time goes by, entropy in an environment will increase. Evolution argues differently against a law that is accepted everywhere by everyone. Evolution says that we started out simple, and over time became more complex. That just isn't possible unless there is a giant outside source of energy supplying the Earth with huge amounts of energy. If there were such a source, scientists would certainly know about it."