to gravity, electromagenetism, nucleosynthesis, astronomy, cosmology, geology,......
So your 'theory' is an insult not only to my intellect but to your own, because it bears NO RESEMBLANCE WHATSOEVER to the half-dozen basic concepts of science that you are ridiculing.
It's as if you took all the things in science that you apparently don't understand ... which is considerable (from the Big Bang, to gravity, electromagenetism, nucleosynthesis, astronomy, cosmology, geology, abiogenesis, and evolution by natural selection) ... threw it all in a blender, and called it ridiculous because YOU don't understand it.
In other words, your 'theory' proves nothing except that you have no earthly clue about ANYTHING in science that you have so wholeheartedly rejected.
We're all allowed to believe, what ever we want to believe.
The fact that you're on here, provoking other people shows you're a rebellion to your own religion as most promote freedom of speech.
Facts are fact. Lipids whilst in water repel the water, and give the cell-like structure. Rocks that fell from out of space that are dated older than our solar system contain amino acids and nucleotides etc. We believe what we atheists believe because we can see it and touch it. However, we leave you 'creationists' to believe your stories in your book. We take to research to help you when you're older - ridden with disease.
And you mock us for it? Lol?
Either way; grow up?
Good strawman, dude.
I don't pretend to know what the exact processes were which created the first functional cell. There are some interesting, plausible hypotheses, though, and it wouldn't surprise me to see one of them promoted to a theory within my lifetime.
Hey. Do you remember when we all thought that lightning was the wrath of the almighty, because we couldn't fathom the natural causes for it? Or when we thought that the Sun was pulled across the sky by a magic chariot? Wouldn't it be hilarious if some day, this question of yours out to be just like that?
