I think they never did!
-
it's very odd there are dozens of anomalies which nasa are unable to explain or just say the questions are based on dubious science.
The space suits were pressurized but in the moon's vacuum they still had wrinkles and folds, if you watch the guys repairing the space station you can see the suits are under tension, in all the "landings" there are no long distance or panoramic shots and some pictures are exactly the same in DIFFERENT landings which nasa attribute to "poor editing", mythbusters got nowhere near explaining some of the anomalies even the "mirror on the moon" section didn't ring true, at the astronomical station where the laser is situated the earth is rotating at 700 mph so if you fire a laser at the moon the reflected beam returns in 3 seconds by which time the detector will be half a mile away, also there is the fact that diffusion and refraction in the atmosphere would make hitting a 2 foot square mirror on a moving body from another moving body from 250000 miles away a feat of marksmanship beyond any human possibility. also the air conditioning units on the suits would have required more water than the entire module could carry and anyway would not work properly in a vacuum , the supposed accident on apollo 13 was also not possible, a plane at 35000 feet that has an explosion disintegrates in seconds yet the module in a vacuum with a thinner skin than a plane stayed together, congress was about to cut nasa's budget at the time but the " accident" restored public interest in the moon shots, a happy co-incidence?
I have examined the photos from the orbiter, I can't see any footprints, but nobody is claiming that equipment didn't go to the moon just that it wasn't manned , the radio signals had to come from space or the moon or that would have been picked up immediately,
no one will explain why a very religious neil armstrong refuses to swear on the bible that he walked on the moon and attacked a reporter who asked him to, it would take 10 seconds and settle the matter
The space suits were pressurized but in the moon's vacuum they still had wrinkles and folds, if you watch the guys repairing the space station you can see the suits are under tension, in all the "landings" there are no long distance or panoramic shots and some pictures are exactly the same in DIFFERENT landings which nasa attribute to "poor editing", mythbusters got nowhere near explaining some of the anomalies even the "mirror on the moon" section didn't ring true, at the astronomical station where the laser is situated the earth is rotating at 700 mph so if you fire a laser at the moon the reflected beam returns in 3 seconds by which time the detector will be half a mile away, also there is the fact that diffusion and refraction in the atmosphere would make hitting a 2 foot square mirror on a moving body from another moving body from 250000 miles away a feat of marksmanship beyond any human possibility. also the air conditioning units on the suits would have required more water than the entire module could carry and anyway would not work properly in a vacuum , the supposed accident on apollo 13 was also not possible, a plane at 35000 feet that has an explosion disintegrates in seconds yet the module in a vacuum with a thinner skin than a plane stayed together, congress was about to cut nasa's budget at the time but the " accident" restored public interest in the moon shots, a happy co-incidence?
I have examined the photos from the orbiter, I can't see any footprints, but nobody is claiming that equipment didn't go to the moon just that it wasn't manned , the radio signals had to come from space or the moon or that would have been picked up immediately,
no one will explain why a very religious neil armstrong refuses to swear on the bible that he walked on the moon and attacked a reporter who asked him to, it would take 10 seconds and settle the matter