What do you think about this theory

I am looking for intelligent input.
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEzHqBW6n…

Don't read this if you are easily hurt by intelligent input.

(note- I wrote this while listening to it, but if I had listened to it first I would have said something snarky instead of wasting my time on this.)

There is ZERO evidence (AT ALL) for wormholes.

Long ago people used to think that black holes (singularities) were a problem because they destroyed information. For example, if you boil water you could theoretically reverse every change and make it into water again, but not if it goes in a black hole. Then, nothing at all ever ever ever could change it. Ever. So they made up the "white hole" which has never been detected even though black holes have and white holes should be amazingly noticeable (it's spewing stuff from nowhere)

This problem was solved by the realization that the closer an object gets to a black hole, the slower time gets relative to an outside observer. If you were to fall into a black hole with me watching, you would feel and see yourself fall strait into the singularity, while I would see you falling ever slower until you stopped, where you would remain visible forever, slowly falling but never reaching the center.

Thanks to this, anything that falls into a black hole can still be seen on the surface of the event horizon of a black hole. like a hologram of all information within being projected onto its surface.

I continued on and realized that most of this is just dumb-

First, fractical isn't a word.

The universe may be a fractal, but it doesn't look like one on the cosmic background radiation from the early universe, and it has an equal chance of being a giant potato.

Atoms aren't created in white holes, that's just stupid. it's like saying that blood comes from vampires injecting it into your neck while you sleep. You don't use a myth to explain something that has its origins well known.