Did neil armstrong land on moon

Yes. This question has been answered here more than 10,000 times, and there's a ton of sites pointing out the basic physics, astronomy, and photography that explain why this copy and paste job is full of crap and a basic misunderstanding of high school level science.

http://www.xmission.com/~jwindley/

The moon has two major light sources. The sun, and the earth. I have no idea about the rest of it, my conspiracy theories are limited to who ate the last cookie.

You have copy+paste this from the web somewhere without any thought to wether it's true or not.

All this stuff has been shown to be false many times.

The moon landings were real. No doubt about it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE4w2MIYh…

What a maroon. The lunar landings were faked on Mars.

The Mythbusters already covered most of these.

1. Shadows on uneven terrain can appear to point in different directions though they come from a single light source. The moon isn't perfectly flat, it's actually quite bumpy.

2. That doesn't imply multiple light sources at all. There is a very high contrast between light and shadow on the moon, because there is no atmosphere to scatter light.

3. There are no stars because the pictures were taken during the daytime. the reason we can't see stars on Earth during the day has nothing to do with the atmosphere (the same atmosphere is there at night!), it's because our eyes adjust to sunlight and no longer let in enough light to see the stars. A photo that lets in enough light for the stars to be visible would be totally overexposed from the sunlight, and would just look white.

4. There is no possibility of an external light source on the moon? What about the sun?

5. The videos of the ascent stage of the LEM blasting off were taken from remote-controlled cameras attached to the lunar rovers.