Is this creationist claim about evolution true
Favorites|Homepage
Subscriptions | sitemap
HOME > Biology > Is this creationist claim about evolution true

Is this creationist claim about evolution true

[From: ] [author: ] [Date: 11-05-16] [Hit: ]
oxfordjournals.org/cgi/conten…Another factor ignored is that once the life cycle with haploid to diploid alternations arose with sexual reproduction there was always the chance of doubling a genome. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_duplic…On the impact of gene duplication producing gene families http://sandwalk.blogspot.......
http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/content/fu…
http://www.gate.net/~rwms/EvoEndosymbiot…
Gene transfer from the mitochondrion into the nucleus
http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/conten…

Another factor ignored is that once the life cycle with haploid to diploid alternations arose with sexual reproduction there was always the chance of doubling a genome.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_duplic…
On the impact of gene duplication producing gene families
http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2007/01/evo…

Evidence of genetic duplication influencing adaptive radiation in teleost fish
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%…

Two Rounds of Whole Genome Duplication in the Ancestral Vertebrate
http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:…

-
When refering that far back you might want to have a look a cell theory in which all life originated from a single cell, this theory works fine with the theory of evolution, suggesting that before our cells became eukaryotes they were once prokaryotes and for some reason they developed other organlles and membranes->we differentiated from bacteria.

The same similarities of genes can then be used to measure the distance in the relationship between the human genome and the bacteria genome.

-
Well when you closely evolution is a very shaky theory.And probably it's biggest hole is it's inability to explain where life and the first bacteria came into being.

-
Leaving aside the appearance of bacteria in the first place evolutionists evolution should be able to explain the increase in information content between the earliest life form and present day complex animals within the time frame available. Currently there is no viable mechanism to explain that. Known rates of mutation and cost of substitution show that this can't have happened by chance (Haldane's dilemma).
It might be that a believable explanation will be available in the future.
keywords: claim,about,creationist,this,evolution,true,Is,Is this creationist claim about evolution true
New
Hot
© 2008-2010 http://www.science-mathematics.com . Program by zplan cms. Theme by wukong .