Do not give me the bible or any other holy book, those are just bedtime stories to me.
-
There is no legitimate scientific evidence of a superior being.
Science is concerned with facts and the extrapolation of observations to explain and understand the universe.
Science is not concerned with proving (or disproving) mythology, religion, or philosophy.
Science is concerned with facts and the extrapolation of observations to explain and understand the universe.
Science is not concerned with proving (or disproving) mythology, religion, or philosophy.
-
"those are just bedtime stories to me"
Don't be a Jackáśś by trying to incite needless controversy. You are an idiot.
-----------------
Science and religion are NOT in dispute with one another. SOME anti-theistic scientists go spouting about religion, but the VAST MAJORITY of scientists are tolerant of people's beliefs. THAT is part of being a human in a society. YOU MUST BE TOLERANT OF PEOPLE'S BELIEFS!!!!!!!!!
Douche.
Don't be a Jackáśś by trying to incite needless controversy. You are an idiot.
-----------------
Science and religion are NOT in dispute with one another. SOME anti-theistic scientists go spouting about religion, but the VAST MAJORITY of scientists are tolerant of people's beliefs. THAT is part of being a human in a society. YOU MUST BE TOLERANT OF PEOPLE'S BELIEFS!!!!!!!!!
Douche.
-
The existence of beings superior to humans is of course, possible. The existence of a -single- superior being such as an almighty 'god' is impossible ... because lifeforms, no matter what their capabilities might be, simply don't 'poof' into existence.
Beings, (superior or not) are always the result of a developing process, which means there must always be a race from which they've originated.
Therefore a legitimate scientific evidence for a single godlike creature can't exist - because the existence of such a creature is simply impossible.
"There's no such thing as perfection." (Professor Stephen Hawking)
Beings, (superior or not) are always the result of a developing process, which means there must always be a race from which they've originated.
Therefore a legitimate scientific evidence for a single godlike creature can't exist - because the existence of such a creature is simply impossible.
"There's no such thing as perfection." (Professor Stephen Hawking)
-
Apparently credible witnesses are not considered scientific evidence, by much of the scientific community.
-
Zero, zip, zilch.
Edit: @ lostfaith; what is the evidence that the Tooth Fairy doesn't exist?
.
Edit: @ lostfaith; what is the evidence that the Tooth Fairy doesn't exist?
.
-
There is no evidence to support God. But the better question is: is there any evidence showing God does not exist?
-
There isn't any scientific evidence.
-
Intelligence is eternal, it can't be created or made.
Explore your own to see for yourself.
Explore your own to see for yourself.
-
There is no god other than Great Cthulhu. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl fhtan!