Did NASA fake the moon landing

No NASA did not fake the moon landing. Any premises that have been made my conspiracy theoriests have been thoroughly debunked by NASA, organisations that are affiliated with NASA and even mythbusters.

Go here to watch the full episode of mythbusters where they debunk all the claims about shadowing, and the weightlessness etc etc.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_qu…

No. There's plenty of evidence on clavius.org to read if you like. In the meantime, consider this. At a time when people were questioning everything, for example because of Vietnam and the draft and the consciousness-expanding use of LSD (for a few), when there was a great deal of distrust for authority - just listen to the lyrics of the pop music of the time - nobody questioned the moon landings. It was not a time of ignorance or obedience to authority, or of accepting the word of the establishment, but a time of questioning everything, and they didn't question that. That's because it happened.

This is of course not a rational argument, but the claim that it didn't happen isn't rational either.

it's very odd there are dozens of anomalies which nasa are unable to explain or just say the questions are based on dubious science.

The space suits were pressurized but in the "moon's" vacuum they still had wrinkles and folds, if you watch the guys repairing the space station you can see the suits are under tension, in all the "landings" there are no long distance or panoramic shots and some pictures are exactly the same in DIFFERENT landings which nasa attribute to "poor editing", mythbusters got nowhere near explaining some of the anomalies even the "mirror on the moon" section didn't ring true, at the astronomical station where the laser is situated the earth is rotating at 700 mph so if you fire a laser at the moon the reflected beam returns in 3 seconds by which time the detector will be half a mile away, also there is the fact that diffusion and refraction in the atmosphere would make hitting a 2 foot square mirror on a moving body from another moving body from 250000 miles away a feat of marksmanship beyond any human possibility. also the air conditioning units on the suits would have required more water than the entire module could carry and anyway would not work properly in a vacuum , the supposed accident on apollo 13 was also not possible, a plane at 35000 feet that has an explosion disintegrates in seconds yet the module in a vacuum with a thinner skin than a plane stayed together, congress was about to cut nasa's budget at the time but the " accident" restored public interest in the moon shots, a happy co-incidence?