Has any scientist published in a scientific journal the result that the hypothesis "life and the universe were formed purely by random chance" has been rejected statistically, based on physical constants of the universe?
-
According to the British mathematician Roger Penrose, the odds of the universe forming by chance are 1 in 10^123...well beyond the normally accepted realm of possibility that is 1 in 10^50.
"Taking the physical variables into account, what is the likelihood of a universe giving us life coming into existence by coincidence? One in billions of billions? Or trillions of trillions of trillions? Or more?
Roger Penrose*, a famous British mathematician and a close friend of Stephen Hawking, wondered about this question and tried to calculate the probability. Including what he considered to be all variables required for human beings to exist and live on a planet such as ours, he computed the probability of this environment occurring among all the possible results of the Big Bang.
According to Penrose, the odds against such an occurrence were on the order of 10^123 to 1"
.......
"In practical terms, in mathematics, a probability of 1 in 10^50 means "zero probability". Penrose's number is more than trillion trillion trillion times less than that. In short, Penrose's number tells us that the 'accidental" or "coincidental" creation of our universe is an impossibility."
http://www.faizani.com/news/news_2003/ma…
The odds of life forming by chance are equally impossible...
http://www.youngearth.org/articles/scien…
http://creationresearch.org/crsq/article…
Dr Werner Gitt...information theory principles suggest that informational systems like DNA cannot form by random chance processes...it requires an intelligent author.
"Genetic information specialist Dr. Werner Gitt shows that coded information can only come from an intelligent source.".
"Taking the physical variables into account, what is the likelihood of a universe giving us life coming into existence by coincidence? One in billions of billions? Or trillions of trillions of trillions? Or more?
Roger Penrose*, a famous British mathematician and a close friend of Stephen Hawking, wondered about this question and tried to calculate the probability. Including what he considered to be all variables required for human beings to exist and live on a planet such as ours, he computed the probability of this environment occurring among all the possible results of the Big Bang.
According to Penrose, the odds against such an occurrence were on the order of 10^123 to 1"
.......
"In practical terms, in mathematics, a probability of 1 in 10^50 means "zero probability". Penrose's number is more than trillion trillion trillion times less than that. In short, Penrose's number tells us that the 'accidental" or "coincidental" creation of our universe is an impossibility."
http://www.faizani.com/news/news_2003/ma…
The odds of life forming by chance are equally impossible...
http://www.youngearth.org/articles/scien…
http://creationresearch.org/crsq/article…
Dr Werner Gitt...information theory principles suggest that informational systems like DNA cannot form by random chance processes...it requires an intelligent author.
"Genetic information specialist Dr. Werner Gitt shows that coded information can only come from an intelligent source.".
12
keywords: the,have,mathematically,chance,not,random,Has,alone,and,science,universe,formed,proven,been,could,by,life,Has science proven mathematically the universe and life could not have been formed by random chance alone