is this possible?
1969 man lands on moon....or did we? im not saying we didnt and im not saying we did.just want to know your views using science about leaving earth and the effects on the body.i dont want stories about how it was faked.i want honest views on things like leaving the atmosphere,radiation from the sun.i know they say they put reflectors on the moon and fire lasers to measure the distance of the moon.but maybe they were not put there by human hand and just using rover type machines.as this is safer and surely cheaper.
1969 man lands on moon....or did we? im not saying we didnt and im not saying we did.just want to know your views using science about leaving earth and the effects on the body.i dont want stories about how it was faked.i want honest views on things like leaving the atmosphere,radiation from the sun.i know they say they put reflectors on the moon and fire lasers to measure the distance of the moon.but maybe they were not put there by human hand and just using rover type machines.as this is safer and surely cheaper.
-
There was nothing special about leaving the atmosphere, or the radiation from the sun. The Apollo capsules were air-tight, and a few millimeters of aluminum were more than enough to stop the radiation.
How come we don't see questions like this about how Christopher Columbus faked his so-called discovery of the "new world". Couldn't he have just sailed in big circles for a few weeks, and landed on some islands near Africa? After all, why aren't there any photos or video of that? Just asking ....
How come we don't see questions like this about how Christopher Columbus faked his so-called discovery of the "new world". Couldn't he have just sailed in big circles for a few weeks, and landed on some islands near Africa? After all, why aren't there any photos or video of that? Just asking ....
-
In 1969 the Soviets had EVERY telescope in the Union pointed at the Moon. Trust me, if they hadn't seen and received the signals they did the "Bogus?" landing would have been all over the World news networks. It wasn't so our biggest detractor was and still is satisfied that we landed.
Secondly, the best special effects people in Hollywood stated point blank; it would have cost more and been more difficult in 1969 to fake the landing than to actually do it.
Third and fake-able are the Hi Res photos from a current lunar orbiter showing the landing site with clearly defined trails where the astronauts walked. As I said, fake-able but the raw data is receivable anywhere on Earth and it could only be faked after it was received by NASA and anyone else watching and listening.
Personally I am completely satisfied that the Apollo moon landings took place as advertised.
Secondly, the best special effects people in Hollywood stated point blank; it would have cost more and been more difficult in 1969 to fake the landing than to actually do it.
Third and fake-able are the Hi Res photos from a current lunar orbiter showing the landing site with clearly defined trails where the astronauts walked. As I said, fake-able but the raw data is receivable anywhere on Earth and it could only be faked after it was received by NASA and anyone else watching and listening.
Personally I am completely satisfied that the Apollo moon landings took place as advertised.