When biologists decide whether or not an orgasm is succ-

essful or not, what criteria do they use to decide which living orgasms are superior to another, and why do they justify that humans are more successful orgasms than bacterial orgasms, when there are more bacterial orgasms, and even more living/flying orgasms than humans?

So why do they say humans are more successful orgasms than other living orgasms?

well it would seem difficult for a bacteria to have an orgasm since it lacks any nervous system or reproductive organs...

on the other hand if we are referring to organisms rather than orgasms, a successful organism is one that leaves many offspring, and scientists do not say that humans are more successful than any other living organisms.

I don't think they would, you could argue that we're more complex than bacteria but to say more succesful (or worse most succesful) is very conceited and athropocentric.

Edit: lol only just realised the orgasm bit