There are two conducting plates of sizes 1 m × 1 m and 2 m × 2 m. Ratio of the?
capacitance of the second one with respect to that of the first one is
(a) 4
(b) 2
(c) 1 2
(d) 1 4
-------------------------------------------------------
answers:
Puzzling say: Capacitance is proportional to the area of overlap and inversely proportional to the separation between conducting sheets. Assuming the separation is the same, then the only factor is the area.
The first plate has an area of 1m². The second has an area of 4m².
The ratio of the capacitance of the *second* to the *first* is:
4 : 1
But apparently that's being reduced to a single number, rather than a ratio since the second number is 1.
Answer:
(a) 4
-
Krishnamurthy say: There are two conducting plates of sizes 1 m × 1 m and 2 m × 2 m.
Ratio of the capacitance of the second one
with respect to that of the first one is
(a) 4
-
Bishop say: tudesdyy
-
jtbbm say: oekyntvw
-
hrcml say: lnzxhiuf
-
qynjr say: tgjjsjmy
-
ysmqg say: opachmzj
-
aoogs say: eiiumgkw
-
qyuss say: ftoqociq
-
ghwei say: dajayydm
-
Puzzling say: Capacitance is proportional to the area of overlap and inversely proportional to the separation between conducting sheets. Assuming the separation is the same, then the only factor is the area.
The first plate has an area of 1m². The second has an area of 4m².
The ratio of the capacitance of the *second* to the *first* is:
4 : 1
But apparently that's being reduced to a single number, rather than a ratio since the second number is 1.
Answer:
(a) 4
-
abtxg say: esiumuoe
-
bbjbr say: dqvmlwsl
-
dlvlv say: uwkikekk
-
zhfqn say: vmdryhhh
-
waewi say: iezccsvk
-
fymsz say: iudtksrt
-
hware say: myezugce
-
ekoea say: mukctghq
-
wuzwo say: hmqtqdsx
-
ocotj say: phpgigii
-
Puzzling say: Capacitance is proportional to the area of overlap and inversely proportional to the separation between conducting sheets. Assuming the separation is the same, then the only factor is the area.
The first plate has an area of 1m². The second has an area of 4m².
The ratio of the capacitance of the *second* to the *first* is:
4 : 1
But apparently that's being reduced to a single number, rather than a ratio since the second number is 1.
Answer:
(a) 4
-
zxwey say: gosioost
-
wcqko say: fgtsxvht
-
fjcol say: hcdvopqt
-
ptrvp say: caegewcu
-
pzpjp say: sgeawycu
-
vvriz say: gyawmmcm
-